Curator Highlights
Last updated: 2026-04-19 | 0 active highlights — all marks resolved 2026-04-19
How this works:
- Add highlights in Obsidian using
==text==on any wiki page (standard highlight, no colour)- For colour-coded verification highlights, use Obsidian’s
<mark style="background: #COLOUR;">text</mark>syntax- Add a comment by placing “ immediately after the highlight on the same line:
==text==- To resolve: remove the
==...==or<mark>markers from the source page- This page is auto-regenerated during lint and on “update highlights” — do not edit manually
Colour Code Legend
| Colour | Hex | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| 🟢 Green | #BBFABBA6 | Verified against raw source file — claim confirmed correct |
| 🔴 Red | #FF5582A6 | Could not verify in raw source file — claim absent, modified, or misstated |
| 🟠 Orange | #FFB86CA6 | Important curator note — verify claim against sources, or methodological caveat |
| 🔵 Blue | #ADCCFFA6 | Better to add a wikilink to a source or related page here |
| 🩷 Pink | #FFB8EBA6 | Curator-highlighted important idea worth returning to |
Resolution Log
ANA and Dengue - Review V2.0 — resolved 2026-04-19
All marks resolved. Summary of actions taken:
🟢 Green (20 marks) — all claims verified against raw source PDFs. Marks stripped; text unchanged.
🟠 Orange (6 marks) — resolved as follows:
| Mark | Resolution |
|---|---|
serum dilution of 1:100 (Berlin2007, §1.4) | Concern already addressed in text (fold-change framed as the interpretable metric). Mark stripped. |
(Viral n=23, 21.7% ANA positivity) (§2.2) | Small-n caveat already noted in surrounding text. Mark stripped. |
The main negative point is the serum dilution ratio was not noted… (§3.1) | Informal curator note rewritten as formal analytical prose: “Key limitation for cross-study comparison. Chatterjee2024 does not report the IIFA serum dilution…” Mark stripped. |
suggesting (§3.2) | Word already appropriately hedges the inference. Curator Highlights note preserved in this log. Mark stripped. |
This non-specific fraction is now mechanistically named (§3.2) | Framing validated after Zhou2007 terminological note was added to §3.2 (previous session). Mark stripped. |
for IgM (§3.2, half-life bullet) | Bullet expanded to explicitly contrast: “Serum half-life ~8 hours for IgM (contrast: IgG half-life ~21 days…).” Mark stripped. |
🔵 Blue (1 mark) — germline-encoded polyreactive IgM (§1.3): wikilink added → [[Polyreactive Antibodies|germline-encoded polyreactive IgM]]. Mark stripped.
🩷 Pink (4 marks) — important ideas confirmed as well-stated in text. No text changes required. Marks stripped. Ideas preserved in the text:
- Female/older cohort demographic confounding (§2.1)
- Dengue must exceed generic viral ANA elevation benchmark (§2.2)
- “Persistence requires an explanation.” (§2.2)
- Non-specific IIFA excess is dengue-specific, not generic febrile illness (§3.2)
Antinuclear Antibodies — resolved 2026-04-19
🟢 Green (15 marks) — all claims verified against raw source PDFs. Marks stripped; text unchanged.
🔴 Red (2 marks) — both investigated and corrected in a prior session (2026-04-18 to 2026-04-19):
~86% of individuals who test ANA-positive at 1:80 do not have SLE— figure not found in any cited source. Replaced with accurate prevalence-derived statement (Satoh2012/Dinse2022).HAV patients were positive for all 8 tested ANA specificities— Berlin2007 Results states only three of ten HAV patients; Discussion overstated this. Wiki corrected to follow Results. Berlin2007 source page updated with ⚠ internal discrepancy note.
No active highlights remain. Add new marks in Obsidian to begin a new annotation cycle.