IgM-IgG Serology ELISA
Overview
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) detection of dengue-specific IgM and IgG antibodies is the most widely used method for dengue diagnosis globally. IgM-capture ELISA (MAC-ELISA) detects acute-phase IgM from approximately day 5–6 of illness. IgG ELISA, when used with paired acute and convalescent sera, can confirm seroconversion or identify secondary (heterotypic) infection by the magnitude of the anamnestic IgG response. Serological methods do not distinguish between the four DENV serotypes and cannot replace molecular methods for early acute-phase diagnosis.
Key Points from Literature
Timing and diagnostic windows
- IgM: appears from day 5–6 of illness; peaks at 2 weeks; may persist for 2–3 months; the primary tool for mid-to-late acute and early convalescent diagnosis
- IgG: rises from approximately day 7–10 in primary infection; in secondary infection, an anamnestic IgG response appears very rapidly — detectable within 1–2 days of illness onset at high titres (>1,280 by HI or ELISA)
- Diagnostic gap: days 1–5 of illness are not covered by serology; during this window, only RT-PCR and NS1 Antigen Detection are informative (see Guzman2016 - Dengue Infection)
Presumptive diagnosis criteria
- Single serum: positive IgM = presumptive dengue (in endemic settings with appropriate clinical presentation)
- Single serum: IgG titer ≥1,280 by haemagglutination inhibition (HI) or ELISA = presumptive secondary dengue infection
- Paired sera: seroconversion from negative to positive IgM, or ≥4-fold IgG titer rise between acute and convalescent samples = confirmed dengue
Primary vs secondary infection discrimination
- In primary dengue: IgM > IgG; low IgG early in illness; IgG titer in convalescent phase typically < 1:1,280
- In secondary dengue: IgG dominates; high IgG from day 1–2 due to anamnestic memory B cell response; IgG:IgM ratio > 1.2 is a common threshold for secondary infection classification in research settings
- This discrimination is important because DHF/DSS risk is substantially higher in secondary infection (see Antibody-Dependent Enhancement)
Formats
- MAC-ELISA (IgM-capture ELISA): most widely used; commercial kits available globally; used in WHO-recommended intermediate-level laboratory testing
- IgG indirect ELISA: paired sera preferred; single high-titer IgG useful in secondary infection context
- Combined NS1 + IgM + IgG RDT: lateral flow devices detecting all three in one cassette; field-applicable; used where ELISA infrastructure unavailable
- PRNT (plaque reduction neutralisation test): gold standard serological assay for definitive serotype-specific neutralising antibody measurement (see PRNT); not an ELISA but often paired with ELISA in reference settings
Zika cross-reactivity (post-2015 complication)
- Zika virus is a flavivirus closely related to DENV; dengue IgM ELISA cross-reacts with Zika antigens
- False-positive dengue IgM serology in Zika-infected patients is documented
- Post-2015 recommendations: wherever Zika co-circulates (most dengue-endemic regions in the Americas, Pacific islands), dengue-positive serology should be reflexively confirmed with Zika-specific testing
- This complication significantly complicates dengue surveillance data from 2015 onwards in Zika-co-endemic areas (see Guzman2016 - Dengue Infection)
Placement in WHO diagnostic tiered structure
- Intermediate level: MAC-ELISA (recommended by WHO for district-level labs)
- Field level: combined RDTs (IgM/IgG ± NS1)
- Reference level: PRNT for definitive serotype-specific confirmation; paired IgG titration
False-Positive Dengue IgM in Patients with Autoantibodies
Santosa2012 - Delayed SLE Diagnosis Dengue Serology (Singapore, case report) identifies a clinically important diagnostic trap in endemic settings: pre-existing SLE generates ~120 autoantibodies via polyclonal B-cell activation, including low-affinity IgM species that can non-specifically cross-bind dengue IgM test kit antigens. This produces false-positive dengue IgM results that can delay the correct rheumatological diagnosis.
Key data points from the authors’ institution using the Panbio Dengue IgM/IgG immunochromatography kit (unpublished local validation, small samples):
- RF-positive patients (n=20): 3/20 (15%) false-positive dengue IgM; 0/20 false-positive dengue IgG
- ANA-positive patients (n=10): 0/10 false-positive for either IgM or IgG
The IgG-sparing pattern is mechanistically interpretable: dengue IgG false positives appear far rarer because the cross-reactive species responsible are low-affinity IgM (exemplified by RF itself — an IgM against IgG Fc — producing 15% false-positive rate). The published commercial kit benchmark for IgM cross-reactivity is even wider: flaviviruses, malaria, leptospirosis, and RF can produce false-positive rates up to 70% across kit types (Hunsperger et al. 2009 multi-kit evaluation, n=10 kits).
Confirmatory signal to use instead: True dengue IgM should persist 8–12 weeks after infection onset. Lack of seroconversion in paired sera (or IgM negativity at 3 weeks) strongly supports false positivity. In patients with known autoantibodies, NS1 Antigen Detection (non-immunological detection; 92% sensitivity, 100% specificity within 9 days) or RT-PCR (within 5 days of fever) are preferred as primary confirmatory tests.
Bidirectional hazard: The reverse is also documented — immunosuppressive therapy and adaptive immunity defects in established rheumatic disease can cause false-negative dengue serology when true dengue occurs in an SLE patient, complicating the lupus-flare vs. infection distinction.
Contradictions & Debates
- Single IgM positivity has lower predictive value in very low-prevalence settings (more false positives) and in areas of Zika co-circulation; clinical judgement and paired testing recommended
- IgG titer thresholds for secondary infection classification vary by assay and region; no single internationally validated cut-off for routine diagnostics
Related Pages
- RT-PCR
- NS1 Antigen Detection
- PRNT
- Viraemia
- Dengue Clinical Classification
- Antibody-Dependent Enhancement
- Secondary Dengue Infection
Sources
- Guzman2016 - Dengue Infection
- Seet2007 - Post-Infectious Fatigue Syndrome in Dengue (double-sandwich capture ELISA, Innis et al. 1989 protocol; 40 IgM units threshold for single-serum acute dengue diagnosis; repeat serology at 2-week follow-up for initially IgM-negative patients)
- Bos2025 - Longitudinal Antibody Dynamics After Dengue (isotype-specific ELISA for all 84 antibody features — IgA, IgG1–4, IgM, across E protein and NS1 antigens; longitudinal kinetics at <1M, 3M, 6M, 18M post-primary and post-secondary; PREPRINT)
- Lin2001 - IgM Anti-Platelet Autoantibody in Dengue Patients (anti-NS1 IgG confirmed in dengue patient sera by ELISA; Taiwan 1998–99 DENV-3 outbreak)
- Oishi2003 - PAIgG and Thrombocytopenia in Secondary Dengue (IgM-capture ELISA for dengue diagnosis, Bundo & Igarashi 1985 protocol; Manila Philippines 2001 secondary-infection cohort; indirect ELISA for anti-dengue specificity in platelet IgG eluates)
- Saito2004 - PAIgG and PAIgM in Secondary Dengue (IgM-capture ELISA for dengue diagnosis; Bundo & Igarashi 1985 protocol; indirect ELISA for anti-dengue IgG and IgM specificity in platelet eluates; Manila Philippines 2002–2003)
- Morel2014 - Autoimmune Response in Children With Dengue (Case 1: IgG and IgM dengue antibodies positive — confirmation of reinfection or early primary; IgM anticardiolipin antibody positive — autoimmune marker by serology)
- Palacios2016 - Autoimmunity in Dengue Literature Review (Lai 2012 reinfection diagnosis by IgG+IgM dual seropositivity; Garcia2009 longitudinal IgG follow-up methodology)
- Vo2020 - Autoantibody Profiling in Dengue (IgM seroconversion from IgM-negative to IgM-positive during hospital stay used as one of three criteria for acute dengue diagnosis; primary/secondary classification used IgG:IgM ratio; Cambodia 2012–2013 cohort)
- Dejnirattisai2010 - Anti-prM Antibodies Enhance Dengue ADE (indirect ELISA for anti-prM and anti-E monoclonal antibody binding to purified antigens; cross-reactivity panel across all four DENV serotypes and JEV controls; note: research ELISA for antibody characterisation, not clinical diagnostic serology)
- Gawali2021 - ANA Prevalence in Seroconverted Dengue Patients (NIV DENGUE IgM Capture ELISA for acute diagnosis; J.MITRA DENGUE IgG MICROLISA at 6-month follow-up to confirm IgG seroconversion; India Central India; n=163)
- Velazqueza2017 - SLE vs Dengue Case Series (dengue serology test positive in both pediatric SLE cases; Guadalajara Mexico; n=2)
- Rajadhyaksha2012 - Dengue Evolving into SLE and Lupus Nephritis (IgM ELISA positive 16.27 [threshold >11]; IgG negative — primary infection classification; Mumbai India; n=1 case report)
- Jardim2012 - Autoimmune Features DHF Case Report (PanBio dengue IgM MAC-ELISA positive; Dengue DuoCassette [PanBio] with both IgM and IgG positive — consistent with secondary infection; Campinas Brazil; n=1 case report)
- Santosa2012 - Delayed SLE Diagnosis Dengue Serology (false-positive dengue IgM in SLE: polyclonal low-affinity IgM autoantibodies cross-bind test kit antigens; RF-positive 3/20 [15%] false-positive with Panbio kit; ANA-positive 0/10; recommended pairing with NS1 antigen or RT-PCR in autoantibody-positive patients; Singapore NUHS)
- Farias2024 - Dengue Mimickers (serology cross-reactivity in differential diagnosis: CHIKV ~6% cross-reactivity with dengue IgM; Zika/YFV cross-reactivity high due to shared flavivirus epitopes; SLE/RA patients produce false-positive dengue IgM via polyclonal IgM autoantibodies [~15% RF-positive]; malaria and leptospirosis also documented as dengue IgM false-positive causes; recommends NS1 antigen or RT-PCR as preferred confirmatory tests when autoantibodies suspected; Brazil narrative review — secondary source)
- Chaturvedi2001 - Cytotoxic Factor Autoantibodies DHF (IgM-capture ELISA used for acute dengue diagnosis at patient enrollment; 1996 Northern India DHF epidemic; n=136 patients; ⚠ group-specific concept paper)
- Hung2008 - Anti-Platelet Anti-Endothelial Autoantibodies Vietnam (IgM seroconversion used for dengue diagnosis in infants without virological confirmation; Panbio dengue IgG and HI serology used to confirm primary vs secondary classification in children; HCMC Vietnam 1998–2002)